UX Missteps That Turn Admissions Ecosystems Into Chaos

The most successful admissions experiences are built on clear architecture, shared rules, and aligned systems — not more content, more tools, or more templates. When admissions websites struggle, it’s rarely because of bad pages or tools. It’s because institutions try to solve ecosystem problems with page-level fixes.

The Seven System Problems

1. Treating a complex ecosystem like a single website
2. Designing around organizational structure instead of student logic
3. Letting tools dictate the experience instead of supporting it
4. Confusing content strategy with writing more content
5. Optimizing pages without defining the conversion journey
6. Ignoring governance until after launch
7. Measuring everything without agreeing on what success means

Does any of this sound familiar?

Let’s find out which problems are most urgent for your institution.

Choose the option that best reflects how your admissions ecosystem works today, and we’ll prioritize the system issues for you.

1. Do different teams have different versions of the student journey?

Yes, very differentTeams work independently; information is duplicated or interpreted differently. Somewhat, but we're aligningThere is some shared language, but structural misalignment remains. No, we're alignedTeams share a clear understanding of the student journey.

2. When you measure success, do departments use different definitions?

Very different—we don't trust each other's dataDashboards conflict and KPIs vary by team. Some overlap, but mostly separateReporting partially overlaps, but definitions and tagging are inconsistent. Aligned metricsThere is a shared view of what success means.

3. How many separate tools must students navigate?

More than 3Students encounter multiple disconnected tools, forms, portals, or widgets. 2-3 tools, but connectedTools are mostly intentional, but handoffs still need work. 1-2 integrated toolsTools support the journey without creating extra friction.

4. How do you handle updates and governance?

Ad hoc—no formal processUpdates happen reactively, with unclear approval or ownership. Informal guidelines, not enforcedRules exist in practice, but not consistently across teams. Clear ownership and publishing rulesGovernance is documented, shared, and maintained.

5. Did your last redesign solve most problems long-term?

No—new problems appeared within monthsThe redesign improved presentation, but systemic issues returned quickly. Partially—some improvements, gaps remainSome changes held, but the experience still fragments over time. Yes—it's still working wellThe ecosystem still supports the journey and team operations.

See My Recommendations